To avoid leading different people astray, https://fetishbreak.com/ please don't confer with movies using the host name youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a link to invidio.us or one of many associated proxy sites. Lead folks to what is sweet, not to what is unhealthy! Just be certain not to decide on a proxy that's "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software program. This way of referring might be fail-protected: it might stop to work, however it is going to in all probability not start main individuals to run nonfree software. There can be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that won't overcome the blockage of entry by way of Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you how I cannot reply. I will not surrender to youtube's nonfree software and surveillance. I take pleasure in accessing the music and video there, however I can't do foolish or desperate issues to maintain that entry. You should not either! You do not want a particular "platform" to post an audio or video on the internet. You possibly can publish an audio or video file on any net site. Just put the file on the location and link to it as if it have been an extraordinary web page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's ad-blocker, saying that blocking advertisements is "interference" with the sites that publicize (and surveil customers via ads). The advert-blocker is proprietary software, identical to this system (Google Play) that Google used to deny access to install it. I might refuse to have either of them on my laptop. Using a nonfree program offers the proprietor energy over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To identify your self to a Google service is a grave error. - Google shops a list of all purchases a person has made that in any manner point out the consumer's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this record, however just one purchase at a time. Then that purchase disappears from the listing that the person sees. Whether it stays in one other checklist, we have no idea, however I'd expect Google to reply that query with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, however the motive is irrelevant - as a result of it isn't an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all along - however solely lately began listening.- Google "sanitizes" its total search logs, then publishes them; however it declines to explain the means of "sanitization", and there is proof that customers could be tracked via them.

The article additionally mentions two-issue authentication, which in and of itself could be a useful technique (although I've learn that crackers can now defeat it), however has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is not to have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was planned from the beginning as a massive surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not only of Gmail customers however of everybody who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly mixed its ad-tracking profiles with its searching profiles.- Google has found a manner to track most credit card purchases in the US, even those not achieved by way of a phone, and correlate that with individuals's online actions.

Google can't do either facet to me, since I pay cash and do not carry a cell phone, and it would not know what websites I have a look at.

- Google Play sends app builders the private details of customers that set up the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this is not enough to legitimize that. We know that the majority customers have given up on reading just what they're "consenting" to, and the reason being that they're accustomed to being told, "If you would like to use this service, you should consent to blah blah blah." To really protect folks's privacy, we should stop Google (and other companies) from getting this private info in the primary place!- Google shops an enormous quantity of knowledge on each consumer. This may embody, in addition to the consumer's search history and advertising profile: - A timeline of the user's location all through every day- Data on the utilization of non-Google phone apps- 'Deleted' emails and information uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privacy initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is involved with US authorities surveillance, abroad and in the US, amounts to quite a package.

Google invites people to let Google monitor their cellphone use, and all web use in their properties, for an extravagant cost of $20.

This malicious functionality isn't a secondary facet of a program with some other goal; this is the software program's sole function, and Google says so. But Google says it in a approach that encourages most people to ignore the main points and remain unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize huge surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "smart" devices to report all exercise to them.

In different phrases, when you've got a "good" (read "spy") lightbulb with that proposed characteristic, and tell an Amazon or Google listening gadget about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off irrespective of how, it might ship a report to Amazon or Google.

Even at present, the only method to make "sensible" merchandise protected is to make sure they can't hook up with anyone else's methods.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when stores mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and records who bought what.

I think that the shop itself should not get this information, which is why I always pay money and never give my name.

*Google faces lawsuit over monitoring in apps even when customers opted out.*

- Google cuts off accounts for customers that resell Pixel telephones. They lose access to all of their mail and documents stored in Google servers beneath that account. It must be illegal to put any "terms of service" on a physical product. It should also be illegal to shut an account on a service with out letting the consumer obtain whatever was saved there. These occasions provide one other reason why colleges should by no means ask a student to use a service account linked to the pupil's title.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have lower off area-fronting, a function used to enable people in tyrannical nations to reach communication techniques which might be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to perform special censorship of Youtube for the federal government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This can assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content material ID" automatically deletes posted movies in a method copyright law doesn't require.- YouTube has made non-public deals with the copyright industry to censor works which can be fair use. More information.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, as a result of her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was introduced as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their own private accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never belief a remote storage firm to maintain anything but a spare backup copy. While you retailer that, put your files into an archive and encrypt it in order that the corporate cannot inform what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox attorneys obtained Youtube to take down criticisms of a video published by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The movies had been nearly absolutely truthful use, but Youtube determined against the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's common submission to the copyright industry constrict's folks's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. Of course, it isn't the only one, however that is not any excuse.- Google helps the TPP because of three principally-evil provisions that might profit Google.- Google has made it so that Chrome now robotically installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for security researchers within the US to research potential insecurity in Chrome. More information.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust legislation to what it was before Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its affect to weaken people who campaign against this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the ability of Google.

- Google advised a reporter in 2011 that internet sites with out "+1" buttons would be punished with decrease search rankings. When she published a narrative in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.